Browsing Tag

Single- Vs. Double-blind

Single-Blind Vs. Double-Blind Peer Review

Feb 13, 2018

Peer review of academic research is at the heart of publishing. It is important that this process is not tainted by reviewer bias. Two popular modes of review exist. In…

Researchers' Poll

In your view, how do retractions most directly contribute to improving research practices?

By removing unreliable findings from the scientific record

By prompting stricter peer review and editorial screening

By encouraging greater transparency in methods and data reporting

By improving researchers’ accountability for errors or misconduct

They do not significantly improve research practices

Unsure

Other(s) (Please specify)

Subscribe now for FREE publishing insights!

I accept the terms and conditions

Single- Vs. Double-blind

Single-Blind Vs. Double-Blind Peer Review

Reporting Research

Publishing Research

Important Links

OUR SERVICES

About Us

GLOBAL ENAGO