Jennifer Mahar podacst

Balancing Tech and Trust in Peer Review: A conversation on Research and Beyond with Jennifer Mahar

By Enago Academy | Speaker: Jennifer Mahar

Explore the constantly evolving landscape of peer review with our special guest, Jennifer Mahar, Executive Peer Review Manager and Client Coordinator at Origin Editorial. As we explore the theme of Innovation and Technology in Peer Review this week, Jennifer, along with our thought leader, unpacks how advancements in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning are revolutionizing the peer review process. Leveraging her 30 years of experience, she provides valuable insights on academic publishing.

Key topics explored:

  • Strategies to combat peer review manipulation using innovative tools
  • Concept of using AI tools in synchronization with human expertise
  • Future of peer review in the age of digital transformation
  • Familiarity with new trends in peer review via continuous learning
  • Significance of recognizing and rewarding peer reviewers

From ethical considerations to practical advice for reviewers using technology, this episode provides invaluable insights for researchers at all career stages.

Tune in to understand how innovation in technology is shaping the future of peer review and learn how to adapt in this rapidly evolving landscape.

Rate this article

Rating*

Your email address will not be published.

We Recommend

Open Science in Action: Kristen Ratan on scale, collaboration, and policy

We’re excited to celebrate Open Access Week 2025 with a special podcast episode featuring Kristen…

Kristen Ratan

Peer Review in the Age of AI: Trust, ethics and transformation

If you’re curious about the future of AI in peer review, check out this special…

Dr. Dave Flanagan

Beyond the Buzz: What ethical AI use really means for publishing

Innovative technologies are set to offer unprecedented efficiencies, but are they without questions about ethics,…

Researchers' Poll

What should be the top priority while integrating AI into the peer review process?