In 2024, a real-world study found that AI-generated exam answers went undetected in 94% of cases and often attained higher marks than student submissions, prompting urgent!-->…
A rapidly changing literature and strong pressures for career advancement mean that peer review speed increasingly shapes researchers’ submission choices. During the first!-->…
Generative AI has moved rapidly from a novelty to a routine tool in many scholarly workflows. Evidence from early adopters indicates substantial uptake: an empirical analysis!-->…
A growing share of researchers use external help to prepare manuscripts: in one recent survey of clinical researchers, about half reported always using professional!-->…
Average reference counts in academic articles have risen substantially: across many disciplines, the number of references per research article grew from about 29 in 2003 to!-->…
Peer review remains the linchpin of scholarly publishing, yet the system’s “black-box” reputation is increasingly at odds with the transparency goals of open science. Recent!-->…
A recent global survey found that roughly one in three researchers had used AI to edit or otherwise help prepare manuscripts, and many respondents understand the need for!-->…
Thesis writing is the culmination of years of research, but the way you present that work determines whether your ideas persuade examiners, reviewers, and readers. For PhD…
A surprising proportion of submitted manuscripts trigger intellectual property (IP) concerns during journal screening: a case-study analysis of 400 consecutive submissions found…
Many journals desk‑reject a substantial share of submissions during initial editorial screening studies and publisher reports commonly show desk‑rejection rates in the tens of…
Unintentional plagiarism remains a persistent risk in scholarly writing and it shows up at all career stages. Even inadvertent textual similarity can trigger desk rejection, damage…
Recent evaluations of generative AI show a worrying pattern: many AI systems produce plausible-looking but incorrect or entirely fabricated bibliographic references. In one…