
Dr. Rebecca D'souza
Rebecca D'souza is an Associate Content Expert at Enago Academy, where she develops insightful content to support researchers and academics in scholarly publishing. With a PhD in Biological Sciences, she specializes in cancer biology and molecular oncology and has presented her work at international and national conferences. Previously, she worked as a Medical Writer, gaining expertise in scientific communication.
She has a strong research background and a deep understanding of the evolving academic landscape. Passionate about open science, research integrity, and science communication, she is committed to making high-quality academic resources more accessible.
Articles Published:
.png)
AI Disclosure Isn’t the Same Everywhere: What business and social science journals actually require
Most AI disclosure advice is written around Nature, Elsevier, COPE and ICMJE, which makes it a poor fit for business and social science submissions. This article compares what Emerald, Sage and IEEE actually require, from an outright ban on generated content to disclose-and-verify to section-by-section accounting, and explains why a disclosure statement written for one journal does not travel to another.

The Long Tail of AI Errors: 550 days of misinformation!
AI-related retractions take a median of 550 days, which means structurally flawed or fabricated findings stay active in the literature for well over a year — and keep drawing citations even after they are withdrawn. This article traces how small verification failures compound across the four stages of the manuscript lifecycle and sets out a pre-submission AI risk audit researchers can apply before they submit.

Why 65% of Publishers Still Have No Clear AI Policy and What It Means for Researchers? – 6 Important Points to Consider
A clear breakdown of why most publishers still lack formal AI-use policies, the risks this creates for researchers, and the practical steps scholars must take to protect their work and reputation.


