Detailed Publisher Guidelines for Authors Using AI in Manuscript Preparation and Submission

This page provides authors with detailed AI guidelines from publishers. These guidelines explain exactly what publishers expect when it comes to using AI tools in research and manuscript preparation. We’ve simplified the information to make it easy for you to understand and follow.

Please review these guidelines carefully to ensure your work meets publisher expectations and avoids issues during submission.

Choose Publishers

Select publishers to compare	Elsevier	European Society of Cardiology (ESC)	Karger	Oxford University Press

Refine, correct, edit, or format the manuscript to improve clarity of language.	allowed	not defined	not defined	allowed
Human Review of AI Output	required	not defined	not defined	mandatory
Disclosure of use of AI tools	required	not defined	not defined	not defined
Disclosure of Human verification of AI output	required	not defined	not defined	not defined

Writing or drafting manuscript content	allowed	allowed	allowed	allowed
Human Review of AI Output	required	not defined	required	mandatory
Human Review for assessing rewritten content to ensure expertise, voice, and originality is maintained.	required	not defined	required	mandatory
Human Review for potential for bias	not defined	not defined	required	mandatory
Human Review for inaccurate attribution	not defined	not defined	required	mandatory
Human Review to ensure tone and style align with the manuscript	not defined	not defined	not defined	mandatory
Human Review for fact checking	required	not defined	required	mandatory
Disclosure of use of AI tools	required	allowed	required	mandatory
Disclosure of Human verification of AI output	required	not defined	required	mandatory

Translation of manuscript text for the purpose of publishing	not defined	allowed	not defined	not defined
Human Review of AI Output	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined
Human Review for assessing translated rewritten content to ensure expertise, voice, and originality is maintained	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined
Human Review for potential for bias	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined
Human Review for inaccurate attribution	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined
Human Review to ensure tone and style align with the manuscript	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined
Human Review for fact checking	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined
Disclosure of use of AI tools	not defined	required	not defined	not defined
Disclosure of Human verification of AI output	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined

Refining or formatting of data reported in the submitted manuscript	not allowed	allowed	not defined	not defined
Human Review of AI Output	not applicable	not defined	not defined	not defined
Disclosure of use of AI tools	not applicable	required	not defined	not defined
Disclosure of Human verification of AI output	not applicable	not defined	not defined	not defined

Generation, refinement, correction, editing or formatting of images, diagrams or other figures for illustrative purposes only	not allowed	allowed	allowed	allowed
Human Review of AI Output	not applicable	not defined	required	mandatory
Human Review to check if images are accurate and not misrepresent information	not applicable	not defined	required	mandatory
Human Review to check if illustrations effectively communicate key concepts	not applicable	not defined	not defined	mandatory
Disclosure of use of AI tools	not applicable	required	required	mandatory
Disclosure of Human verification of AI output	not applicable	not defined	required	mandatory

AI tools used to generate, modify, or enhance images that support specific scientific, clinical, or technical claims	not defined	not defined	not defined	not allowed

Generation, refinement, correction, editing or formatting of visualisations of research data or results	not allowed	allowed	not defined	not allowed
Human Review of AI Output	not applicable	not defined	not defined	not defined explicitly
Disclosure of use of AI tools	not applicable	required	not defined	not defined explicitly
Disclosure of Human verification of AI output	not applicable	not defined	not defined	not defined explicitly

Refinement or formatting of code reported in the submitted manuscript	not defined	allowed	not defined	not defined
Human Review of AI Output	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined
Disclosure of use of AI tools	not defined	required	not defined	not defined
Disclosure of Human verification of AI output	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined

Assisting with compilation of reference lists	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined
Human Review of AI Output	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined
Disclosure of use of AI tools	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined
Disclosure of Human verification of AI output	not defined	not defined	not defined	not defined

Presentation of any kind of content generated by AI as though it were original research data/results from non-machine sources	not defined	not defined	not defined	not allowed

Official AI Policy Guide Link	Elsevier AI Policy	European Society of Cardiology (ESC) AI Policy	Karger AI Policy	OUP AI Policy

Last Updated	-	-	-	-

Detailed Publisher Guidelines for Authors Using AI in Manuscript Preparation and Submission

Looking for something not covered here?