{"id":57229,"date":"2025-12-26T20:29:54","date_gmt":"2025-12-26T14:29:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/?p=57229"},"modified":"2026-05-07T12:03:47","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T12:03:47","slug":"geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/","title":{"rendered":"The Geography of Prestige: Institutional and Regional Bias in Top Journals"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<header><span style=\"color: #4a4a4a; font-size: 20px; text-transform: initial;\">A <\/span><a style=\"font-size: 20px; text-transform: initial;\" href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/38082157\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">bibliometric analysis<\/a><span style=\"color: #4a4a4a; font-size: 20px; text-transform: initial;\"> of 10,558 original research articles published in five leading medical journals (NEJM, JAMA, Nature Medicine, The Lancet, and BMJ) between 2010 and 2019 found that corresponding-author affiliations came from only 77 countries, but just 32 countries accounted for 98.9% of all affiliations with the United States (48.2%) and the United Kingdom (15.9%) dominating the record. This concentration illustrates a clear geographic skew in high-impact medical publishing and raises questions about who sets global research agendas and who is heard.<\/span><\/header>\n<p>This article examines evidence for regional and institutional bias in high-impact journals; explores mechanisms that produce and reproduce these disparities; discusses consequences for science and equity; and offers practical, evidence-informed steps that researchers, institutions, and journals can take to reduce the imbalance.<\/p>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 counter-flat ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"#\" data-href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#What_the_Evidence_Shows\" >What the Evidence Shows<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"#\" data-href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#How_These_Disparities_Arise\" >How These Disparities Arise<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"#\" data-href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#Why_This_Matters\" >Why This Matters<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"#\" data-href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#Practical_Steps_for_Researchers_Institutions_and_Journals\" >Practical Steps for Researchers, Institutions, and Journals<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"#\" data-href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#Progress_Practices\" >Progress Practices<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"#\" data-href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#Common_Misconceptions\" >Common Misconceptions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"#\" data-href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#Conclusion_and_Next_Steps\" >Conclusion and Next Steps<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_the_Evidence_Shows\"><\/span><strong>What the Evidence Shows<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<section>Large-scale bibliometric studies document uneven geographic representation across fields. An <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/38082157\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">analysis<\/a> of hundreds of thousands of health-science records found that while the proportion of publications with at least one author affiliated with a low- or middle-income country (LMIC) has increased, first- and last-author positions remain substantially underrepresented for many low-income countries. This indicates gains in inclusion at the contributor level but persistent gaps in leadership positions on papers about LMIC settings.Field-specific audits mirror these trends. In global <a href=\"https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC9237874\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">emergency medicine<\/a> and family medicine literature, authors affiliated with high-income countries (HICs) are disproportionately represented in first and senior (last) authorship roles, even when the research concerns LMIC contexts. Such patterns suggest that collaboration does not always translate into equitable credit or leadership.Editorial and decision-making power is similarly concentrated. Analyses of editorial boards and journal operations show overrepresentation of scholars from HICs and centers of institutional prestige, with many editorial boards dominated by members affiliated with a small set of nations and institutions. <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/40640968\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Recent audits of tropical medicine journals<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s43856-023-00418-2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">studies of top medical journals<\/a> document regional skew and a tendency for journals to publish research from their own country or region more frequently.<\/section>\n<section>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_These_Disparities_Arise\"><\/span><strong>How These Disparities Arise<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Language and Gatekeeping<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>English-language dominance and the practical realities of writing, reviewing, and editing in English create an initial barrier. Manuscripts from nonnative English-speaking authors may face harsher scrutiny for language quality, which can translate into desk rejections or greater revision burdens. The journal system\u2019s reliance on English therefore interacts with geography to disadvantage many researchers.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Editorial Composition and Networks<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Editorial boards and reviewer pools frequently reflect the same institutional and geographic concentrations seen in publications. Editors and reviewers tend to recruit from familiar networks, increasing the likelihood that submissions from well-known institutions or countries receive preferential treatment. Studies show journals more commonly publish work from their home country and that authors preferentially cite domestic work, reinforcing a cycle of recognition and visibility.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Metric Incentives and Prestige Economies<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Reliance on indicators such as the <em>impact factor<\/em> shapes incentives: institutions and authors pursue publications that maximize perceived prestige, favoring journals that already concentrate citations and visibility. The <em>impact factor<\/em> itself is calculated on citation counts across a short window, which can advantage fields and topics more visible in HIC contexts. These incentive structures elevate institutions with resources and established reputations, a pattern often called a \u201cMatthew effect\u201d in science.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Capacity and Resource Gaps<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Research infrastructure, funding, and access to methodological support vary widely across countries and institutions. Limited grant funding, constrained laboratory or field capacity, and restricted access to statistical or editorial support hamper the ability of many researchers to produce work that meets the formal expectations of top-tier journals.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_This_Matters\"><\/span><strong>Why This Matters<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Skewed editorial and publishing patterns have three important consequences. First, research agendas shift toward questions prioritized by well-represented institutions, leaving critical local problems understudied. Second, exclusion from high-visibility outlets reduces researchers\u2019 access to career-advancing recognition, grants, and collaborations. Third, the evidence base that informs policy and practice can become less applicable to underrepresented settings, undermining global equity in science and health. The combined effect is <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/38082157\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">a self-reinforcing system<\/a> that preserves existing power centers in knowledge production.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Practical_Steps_for_Researchers_Institutions_and_Journals\"><\/span><strong>Practical Steps for Researchers, Institutions, and Journals<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n  <div class=\"svc\">\r\n    <div class=\"svc-body\">\r\n      <span class=\"svc-cat\">\r\n       \r\n        Expert Editing\r\n      <\/span>\r\n      <div class=\"svc-row\">\r\n        <div class=\"svc-ic\">\r\n          <svg viewBox=\"0 0 200 200\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\r\n            <path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M198.207 70.1185C195.92 65.3714 193.104 61.0119 188.963 57.6453C185.159 54.5452 180.825 52.7771 175.986 52.1474C170.04 51.3966 164.31 52.3654 158.701 54.2061C155.282 55.3202 151.984 56.7734 148.854 58.5657C148.493 58.7836 148.3 58.711 148.036 58.4203C143.991 54.0123 138.959 51.6146 133.061 50.9364C129.739 50.5489 126.441 50.7669 123.094 51.4935C122.998 50.5247 122.926 49.6043 122.805 48.684C122.276 44.1791 120.976 39.9406 118.231 36.2592C115.053 31.9965 110.768 29.5019 105.664 28.412C99.5732 27.1283 93.6989 27.7338 88.1858 30.7613C82.769 33.7403 79.6152 38.4632 78.1226 44.3486C77.6411 46.3104 77.4485 48.3449 77.1355 50.3309C77.0874 50.6942 77.0392 51.0575 76.9911 51.445C75.7392 51.2755 74.5354 51.0333 73.3317 50.9122C65.1463 50.1614 57.8757 52.1716 52.0978 58.3719C51.7848 58.711 51.5922 58.7594 51.1588 58.5414C45.6939 55.4655 39.8919 53.31 33.7047 52.3412C27.2767 51.3482 21.0173 51.8326 15.143 54.9569C10.7373 57.282 7.31873 60.697 4.74273 64.9355C3.32232 67.2848 2.11858 69.7552 1.01114 72.2741C0.50557 73.4366 0.433346 74.7929 0.168523 76.0524C0.0722243 76.5126 0.0481495 76.9727 0 77.4087V79.0072C0.096299 79.7822 0.168523 80.5815 0.240748 81.3565C0.794467 86.8786 2.45562 92.1101 4.5742 97.2205C7.77614 104.85 11.917 111.97 16.6838 118.679C19.7654 123.015 23.0636 127.205 26.2896 131.443C26.6267 131.879 26.7711 132.267 26.7711 132.824C26.7711 142.1 26.7711 151.352 26.7711 160.628V161.403H173.242V160.604C173.242 151.328 173.242 142.076 173.242 132.799C173.242 132.291 173.386 131.879 173.699 131.492C179.405 124.516 184.726 117.25 189.276 109.452C192.911 103.251 196.041 96.8088 198.087 89.8819C199.146 86.2731 199.845 82.616 199.989 78.8377C200.085 75.8102 199.556 72.9038 198.207 70.1427V70.1185ZM116.931 72.6132C119.965 71.6202 122.878 72.0319 125.67 73.4366C131.183 76.2219 134.409 80.6784 135.083 86.8544C135.493 90.6085 134.698 94.2172 133.326 97.7049C131.207 103.057 128.005 107.732 124.274 112.043C123.239 113.254 122.107 114.417 121 115.579C120.831 115.773 120.518 115.942 120.277 115.942C116.594 116.088 112.911 116.209 109.227 116.33C109.083 116.33 108.938 116.33 108.794 116.306C108.794 113.036 108.794 109.863 108.794 106.69C108.794 102.791 108.866 98.8917 108.914 94.9681C108.962 89.7608 109.035 84.5535 109.131 79.3463C109.131 78.9345 109.299 78.4259 109.564 78.1111C111.562 75.6406 113.874 73.582 116.955 72.5647L116.931 72.6132ZM95.4082 42.7986C99.0195 41.6845 102.655 41.636 106.025 43.6947C108.818 45.4143 110.407 48.0785 111.394 51.1302C111.683 52.0505 111.851 53.0193 112.116 53.9397C112.261 54.3999 112.116 54.5936 111.707 54.8116C108.722 56.3617 105.76 57.936 102.799 59.5345C101.908 60.0189 101.114 60.6244 100.223 61.2056C98.3213 59.9946 96.3953 58.711 94.4212 57.5C92.6156 56.3859 90.7859 55.3444 88.7395 54.7632C88.5951 54.7147 88.4266 54.521 88.4025 54.3756C87.7043 49.8223 91.0266 44.1549 95.4082 42.7986ZM64.9778 87.024C65.5315 81.5503 68.1315 77.2876 72.802 74.357C74.9688 73.0007 77.28 72.1045 79.856 72.1045C82.7209 72.1045 85.2246 73.1702 87.3914 74.9867C88.5469 75.9555 89.5581 77.0938 90.5933 78.2079C90.834 78.4744 91.0026 78.9345 91.0026 79.3221C91.1229 88.1623 91.1952 97.0025 91.2915 105.867C91.3155 109.209 91.3637 112.576 91.4118 115.918C91.4118 116.039 91.4118 116.16 91.3878 116.33C90.6655 116.33 89.9914 116.33 89.3173 116.33C86.2117 116.209 83.082 116.112 79.9763 115.967C79.7115 115.967 79.3985 115.87 79.2059 115.7C73.8373 110.275 69.2631 104.293 66.5185 97.051C65.2907 93.8297 64.6407 90.4632 65.0018 87.024H64.9778ZM33.5843 116.064C28.649 110.614 24.4359 104.68 21.6432 97.826C20.2469 94.3626 19.3561 90.8022 19.5005 87.024C19.6931 82.0347 21.7154 77.9173 25.4952 74.6961C27.3248 73.146 29.5879 72.5163 31.9231 72.2256C36.3047 71.6928 40.4215 72.7343 44.3938 74.4054C44.5864 74.5023 44.8272 74.7929 44.8513 75.0109C45.0439 78.547 45.1402 82.1073 45.405 85.6434C45.9587 92.9336 46.7772 100.2 48.8236 107.248C49.5458 109.718 50.4125 112.091 51.857 114.247C52.1941 114.756 52.5793 115.216 53.0126 115.821C52.3385 115.87 51.8089 115.918 51.2551 115.918C45.6698 116.064 40.0604 116.209 34.475 116.354C34.1861 116.354 33.7769 116.257 33.6084 116.064H33.5843ZM160.94 152.999H40.4456V127.883H160.916V152.999H160.94ZM180.537 89.4944C180.031 95.0649 177.792 100.006 174.999 104.753C172.616 108.773 169.823 112.455 166.669 115.894C166.453 116.112 166.092 116.354 165.803 116.33C159.688 116.185 153.549 115.991 147.434 115.821C147.362 115.821 147.265 115.797 147.121 115.749C150.058 112.188 151.189 107.95 152.201 103.663C153.284 99.0612 153.958 94.411 154.319 89.7124C154.68 84.8684 154.921 80.0002 155.21 75.132C155.21 74.7687 155.258 74.5265 155.643 74.357C159.158 72.9038 162.769 71.935 166.621 72.0561C168.355 72.1045 170.064 72.4436 171.701 73.0491C175.144 74.357 177.262 77.0212 178.899 80.1697C180.392 83.0761 180.825 86.2247 180.537 89.4702V89.4944ZM27.0841 169.444H173.362V164.067H27.0841V169.444ZM56.4071 148.857C61.0054 148.857 64.8092 145.03 64.7852 140.429C64.7852 135.803 60.9813 132 56.3831 132C51.7848 132 47.981 135.827 48.0051 140.429C48.0291 145.03 51.8089 148.857 56.4071 148.857ZM78.5318 148.857C83.1301 148.857 86.9339 145.055 86.9339 140.429C86.9339 135.803 83.1301 132 78.5318 132C73.9336 132 70.1298 135.803 70.1298 140.429C70.1298 145.055 73.9336 148.857 78.5318 148.857ZM100.657 148.857C105.255 148.857 109.059 145.079 109.083 140.453C109.083 135.827 105.303 132 100.705 132C96.1064 132 92.3026 135.803 92.2785 140.404C92.2785 145.03 96.0583 148.857 100.657 148.857ZM122.829 148.857C127.428 148.857 131.207 145.03 131.207 140.404C131.207 135.778 127.404 131.976 122.805 131.976C118.207 131.976 114.427 135.803 114.427 140.429C114.427 145.055 118.231 148.857 122.829 148.857ZM144.954 148.857C149.552 148.857 153.356 145.055 153.356 140.429C153.356 135.803 149.552 132 144.954 132C140.356 132 136.552 135.827 136.552 140.429C136.552 145.055 140.356 148.857 144.954 148.857Z\" fill=\"#FEC043\"><\/path>\r\n          <\/svg>\r\n        <\/div>\r\n        <h4>Two expert editors. Beyond grammar.<\/h4>\r\n      <\/div>\r\n      <p class=\"svc-desc\">Two subject-matched, native English editors \u2014 covering language, logical flow, and content enhancement. 365-day Rejection Shield included.<\/p>\r\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/substantive-editing\" class=\"svc-btn\" target=\"_blank\">Get Substantive Editing \u2192<\/a>\r\n    <\/div>\r\n  <\/div>\r\n    \n<h3><strong>Researchers (Early-Career and Experienced)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Prioritize equitable collaboration. Negotiate authorship, leadership, and data-sharing plans at project outset to ensure local researchers have opportunities for first and senior authorship whenever appropriate.<\/li>\n<li>Strengthen manuscript readiness. Use <a href=\"https:\/\/enago.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">language and editorial support<\/a> to address presentation-related barriers. Consider preprints to accelerate dissemination and to document findings prior to formal <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/publication-support-services\/peer-review-process\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"26\" title=\"Peer Review\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">peer review<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Choose journals strategically. Examine a journal\u2019s editorial board, peer-review policies, and regional publishing patterns before submission. Where possible, prefer journals with transparent diversity or inclusion statements. Enago\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/publication-support-services\/journal-selection\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">journal selection assistance<\/a> can help identify journals that match scope and objectives while considering acceptance likelihood and indexing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Institutions and Administrators<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Reward substantive contributions beyond JIF. Reform promotion and hiring criteria to value societal impact, capacity building, policy influence, and collaborative leadership not only publications in high-impact journals.<\/li>\n<li>Invest in capacity. Fund writing workshops, statistical and methodological support, and mentorship programs that prepare researchers to compete on an even footing for top-tier outlets. Institutional partnerships that include reciprocal training and infrastructure support can reduce dependence on external HIC partners.<\/li>\n<li>Support open science and regional dissemination. Encourage publication in reputable regional journals and repositories, and recognize these outputs in performance evaluations.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Journals and Publishers<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Diversify editorial leadership and reviewer pools. Recruit editors and editorial board members from underrepresented regions and institutions, and publish metrics on board composition to ensure transparency. <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/40640968\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Recent analyses<\/a> call for explicit DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) strategies for editorial recruitment.<\/li>\n<li>Mitigate language bias. Offer language-editing support options and accept submissions in multiple languages where feasible; consider formal pathways for language improvement rather than immediate desk rejection.<\/li>\n<li>Adopt bias-resistant <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/publication-support-services\/peer-review-process\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"26\" title=\"Peer Review\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">peer review<\/a>. Implement double-anonymized review where practical, and provide reviewer training on equity and cultural competence. Monitor and report acceptance rates by country and institution to detect and address systemic patterns.<\/li>\n<li>Revisit metric-driven incentives. Balance citation-based metrics with measures of societal impact, reproducibility, and methodological rigor when promoting journals or shaping editorial priorities.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/section>\n<section>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Progress_Practices\"><\/span><strong>Progress Practices<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Traditional publication bias usually refers to selective reporting of positive or significant results. Geographic and institutional bias are broader structural phenomena: they govern access to editorial influence, shape which research questions are prioritized, and determine whose voices appear in the most visible venues. Addressing these disparities therefore requires systemic change across editorial practice, evaluation criteria, and resource allocation.<\/p>\n<p>Some journals have begun to publish audits of editorial and authorship diversity, and publishers are experimenting with regional editors and mentorship schemes to support authors from LMICs. Audits that quantify domestic preference and Anglocentric dominance and make those results public can drive corrective action by revealing where disparities are largest. Regular monitoring, public reporting, and concrete targets for editorial diversity are practical, measurable steps journals can adopt.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Common_Misconceptions\"><\/span><strong>Common Misconceptions<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Do not conflate \u201clower visibility\u201d with \u201clower quality.\u201d Many high-quality studies from underrepresented settings fail to reach top journals for structural, not scientific, reasons.<\/li>\n<li>Avoid tokenism. Genuine inclusion requires shifting decision-making power not merely adding a small number of board members from diverse regions.<\/li>\n<li>Track progress. Institutions and journals should collect and publish disaggregated metrics (by country, institution type, and language) to evaluate whether reforms are working.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/section>\n<section>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion_and_Next_Steps\"><\/span><strong>Conclusion and Next Steps<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Geographic and institutional disparities in high-impact journals are not isolated faults but systemic features of the current scholarly ecosystem. Evidence from large bibliometric audits and editorial board studies shows a persistent concentration of publication and decision-making power in a small set of countries and institutions. Addressing these disparities requires coordinated action: researchers and institutions should negotiate equitable collaborations and invest in capacity; journals and publishers should diversify editorial leadership, reduce language-based gatekeeping, and adopt bias-resistant review practices; and funders should support infrastructure that enables researchers worldwide to lead work relevant to their contexts.<\/p>\n<p>For authors seeking practical help to navigate these structural barriers, targeted support can reduce nonscientific causes of rejection. Consider professional <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/editing-services\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">academic editing services<\/a> to improve clarity and presentation. These services can help level the playing field for authors whose work deserves broader visibility.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<\/article>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A bibliometric analysis of 10,558 original research articles published in five leading medical journals (NEJM, JAMA, Nature Medicine, The Lancet, and BMJ) between 2010 and 2019 found that corresponding-author affiliations came from only 77 countries, but just 32 countries accounted for 98.9% of all affiliations with the United States (48.2%) and the United Kingdom (15.9%) [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":57931,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57229","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-research-integrity"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Geography of Prestige: Institutional and Regional Bias in Top Journals - Enago Articles<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Discover how institutional and regional bias affects top journal publications. Learn evidence-based strategies for researchers, institutions, and journals to reduce geographic disparities in academic publishing.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Geography of Prestige: Institutional and Regional Bias in Top Journals - Enago Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Discover how institutional and regional bias affects top journal publications. Learn evidence-based strategies for researchers, institutions, and journals to reduce geographic disparities in academic publishing.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Enago Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-26T14:29:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-07T12:03:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/The-Geography-of-Prestige.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1536\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"908\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Richard Murphy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Richard Murphy\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Geography of Prestige: Institutional and Regional Bias in Top Journals - Enago Articles","description":"Discover how institutional and regional bias affects top journal publications. Learn evidence-based strategies for researchers, institutions, and journals to reduce geographic disparities in academic publishing.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Geography of Prestige: Institutional and Regional Bias in Top Journals - Enago Articles","og_description":"Discover how institutional and regional bias affects top journal publications. Learn evidence-based strategies for researchers, institutions, and journals to reduce geographic disparities in academic publishing.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/","og_site_name":"Enago Articles","article_published_time":"2025-12-26T14:29:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-07T12:03:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1536,"height":908,"url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/The-Geography-of-Prestige.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Richard Murphy","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Richard Murphy","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":["Article","BlogPosting"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/"},"author":{"name":"Richard Murphy","@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/#\/schema\/person\/60b60b5c7014833d3b277d396294cb8a"},"headline":"The Geography of Prestige: Institutional and Regional Bias in Top Journals","datePublished":"2025-12-26T14:29:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-07T12:03:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/"},"wordCount":1320,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/The-Geography-of-Prestige.webp","articleSection":["Research Integrity"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/","url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/","name":"The Geography of Prestige: Institutional and Regional Bias in Top Journals - Enago Articles","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/The-Geography-of-Prestige.webp","datePublished":"2025-12-26T14:29:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-07T12:03:47+00:00","description":"Discover how institutional and regional bias affects top journal publications. Learn evidence-based strategies for researchers, institutions, and journals to reduce geographic disparities in academic publishing.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/The-Geography-of-Prestige.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/The-Geography-of-Prestige.webp","width":1536,"height":908},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/geographic-bias-academic-journals-evidence-solutions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Geography of Prestige: Institutional and Regional Bias in Top Journals"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/","name":"Articles","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Enago Articles","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/#organization","name":"Enago Articles","url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/logo-enago-seo-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/logo-enago-seo-1.png","width":1200,"height":630,"caption":"Enago Articles"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/#\/schema\/person\/60b60b5c7014833d3b277d396294cb8a","name":"Richard Murphy","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/046a0ceeb5c38172654db93f9919593bc2e4e1391702eb8b7248865941ddbe18?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/046a0ceeb5c38172654db93f9919593bc2e4e1391702eb8b7248865941ddbe18?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/046a0ceeb5c38172654db93f9919593bc2e4e1391702eb8b7248865941ddbe18?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Richard Murphy"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/richard-murphy-32b994136?utm_source=share_via&utm_content=profile&utm_medium=member_ios"],"url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/author\/richard-murphy\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57229","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57229"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57229\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57805,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57229\/revisions\/57805"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/57931"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57229"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57229"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}