{"id":57050,"date":"2025-12-02T18:04:52","date_gmt":"2025-12-02T12:04:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/?p=57050"},"modified":"2026-03-31T14:49:25","modified_gmt":"2026-03-31T08:49:25","slug":"ai-powered-paper-mills-research-integrity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/ai-powered-paper-mills-research-integrity\/","title":{"rendered":"AI-Powered Paper Mills: The New Threat to Research Integrity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- Introduction Section --><\/p>\n<p>A <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/40758886\/\">recent landscape study<\/a> found more than 32,700 suspected fake papers linked to organised \u201cpaper mills,\u201d and concluded that fraudulent outputs are growing faster than corrective measures can keep up. This accelerating problem now intersects with generative artificial intelligence (AI), which lowers the cost and time needed to create superficially plausible manuscripts. The result is an industry increasingly AI-enabled that continues to persist despite well\u2011documented ethical violations. This article explains what AI\u2011powered paper mills are, why researchers turn to them, which institutional and societal factors enable the practice, and practical steps researchers, administrators, and publishers can take to reduce risk.<\/p>\n<p><!-- What Are AI-Powered Paper Mills, and How Has AI Changed the Landscape Section --><\/p>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_74 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/ai-powered-paper-mills-research-integrity\/#What_Are_AI-Powered_Paper_Mills_and_How_Has_AI_Changed_the_Landscape\" >What Are AI-Powered Paper Mills, and How Has AI Changed the Landscape?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/ai-powered-paper-mills-research-integrity\/#Why_Researchers_Continue_to_Use_Paper_Mills_Personal_Motivations\" >Why Researchers Continue to Use Paper Mills: Personal Motivations<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/ai-powered-paper-mills-research-integrity\/#Institutional_and_Systemic_Enablers\" >Institutional and Systemic Enablers<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/ai-powered-paper-mills-research-integrity\/#Risks_to_Academic_Publishing_and_to_Researchers\" >Risks to Academic Publishing and to Researchers<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/ai-powered-paper-mills-research-integrity\/#How_Publishers_and_the_Community_Are_Responding\" >How Publishers and the Community Are Responding<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/ai-powered-paper-mills-research-integrity\/#Practical_Steps_for_Researchers_Administrators_and_Publishers\" >Practical Steps for Researchers, Administrators, and Publishers<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/ai-powered-paper-mills-research-integrity\/#A_Short_Checklist_for_Research_Groups_and_Journal_Offices\" >A Short Checklist for Research Groups and Journal Offices<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/ai-powered-paper-mills-research-integrity\/#Conclusion_and_Practical_Support\" >Conclusion and Practical Support<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_Are_AI-Powered_Paper_Mills_and_How_Has_AI_Changed_the_Landscape\"><\/span><strong>What Are AI-Powered Paper Mills, and How Has AI Changed the Landscape?<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>A <em>paper mill<\/em> is a third\u2011party service that produces manuscripts (and sometimes data, images, or authorship slots) for payment. Traditional mills have relied on template text, image reuse, and manual fabrication. The emergence and rapid improvement of large language models and other generative AI tools have reduced the technical and time barriers to producing readable, plausible text and synthetic figures, enabling mills to scale faster and with fewer specialist staff. Publishers and integrity researchers <a href=\"https:\/\/retractionwatch.com\/2024\/03\/14\/up-to-one-in-seven-of-submissions-to-hundreds-of-wiley-journals-show-signs-of-paper-mill-activity\">report<\/a> that modern detection pipelines now explicitly look for hallmarks of generative AI use as one indicator of potential third\u2011party manipulation.<\/p>\n<p><!-- Why Researchers Continue to Use Paper Mills: Personal Motivations Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_Researchers_Continue_to_Use_Paper_Mills_Personal_Motivations\"><\/span><strong>Why Researchers Continue to Use Paper Mills: Personal Motivations<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Pressure to publish remains one of the strongest drivers. Universities, funders, and many national systems still reward raw publication counts, journal placement, and citation metrics for hiring, promotion, tenure, and funding decisions. When career progression, graduation requirements, or immigration and job prospects hinge on a publication record, the temptation to shortcut the process grows especially for time\u2011constrained or early\u2011career researchers. Research <a href=\"https:\/\/council.science\/blog\/publish-or-perish-mentality\" class=\"broken_link\">shows<\/a> the wider \u201cpublish or perish\u201d culture correlates with higher rates of retractions and questionable practices.<\/p>\n<p>Other personal motivations include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Time scarcity<\/strong> and workload pressures that leave little room for designing, conducting, and writing original studies.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Language and skills barriers<\/strong> that make manuscript preparation slow or daunting for non\u2011native English speakers.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Financial incentives<\/strong> in some systems (bonuses for publications, grant metric rewards).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Desire for rapid career advancement<\/strong> or to meet institutional or graduation targets.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>These drivers do not excuse misconduct, but they help explain why some researchers rationalise or resort to paying for authorship or ready\u2011made papers. <a href=\"https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC11582143\/\">Empirical reviews<\/a> show third\u2011party services range from legitimate editing to illegitimate full\u2011service fabrication, and non\u2011disclosure of third\u2011party involvement is itself an ethical violation.<\/p>\n<p><!-- Institutional and Systemic Enablers Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Institutional_and_Systemic_Enablers\"><\/span><strong>Institutional and Systemic Enablers<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Several system\u2011level features enable paper mills to persist:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Perverse incentives<\/strong>: Performance metrics that emphasize quantity over quality publication counts, simplistic use of impact factors, or cash payments per paper create <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2309.15884\">demand for shortcuts<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Weak editorial workflows<\/strong>: Special issues, rushed review streams, and reliance on author\u2011suggested reviewers create exploitable gaps. The <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/40758886\/\">PNAS landscape study<\/a> found evidence of broker networks and editorial clusters that correlate with higher rates of problematic papers.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Market fragmentation<\/strong>: Predatory or low\u2011barrier journals, and hijacked or compromised special\u2011issue processes, offer <a href=\"https:\/\/retractionwatch.com\/2023\/12\/19\/hindawi-reveals-process-for-retracting-more-than-8000-paper-mill-articles\/\">easier publication routes<\/a> at lower scrutiny, which mills exploit.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Global inequities<\/strong>: Researchers in regions with fewer training resources, limited mentorship, or high publication demands may be disproportionately vulnerable to outsourcing and exploitation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Insufficient detection capacity<\/strong>: While screening tools have improved, detection and investigation are resource intensive; retractions and corrections still <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/40758886\/\">lag behind<\/a> the growth of suspected fraudulent outputs.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!-- Risks to Academic Publishing and to Researchers Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Risks_to_Academic_Publishing_and_to_Researchers\"><\/span><strong>Risks to Academic Publishing and to Researchers<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>AI\u2011enabled mass production of fraudulent papers threatens science on multiple levels. First, it corrupts the evidence base: fabricated or manipulated results can mislead systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, and downstream research. Second, it wastes time and funding when other teams build on unreliable findings. Third, it undermines trust in journals, institutions, and the scientific enterprise. Finally, discovery of paper\u2011mill involvement carries severe consequences for implicated researchers and institutions, from retraction and reputational harm to investigations, sanctions, and career derailment. High\u2011profile mass retractions and journal closures in recent years illustrate both the scale of the problem and its real costs to publishers and institutions.<\/p>\n<p><!-- How Publishers and the Community Are Responding Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_Publishers_and_the_Community_Are_Responding\"><\/span><strong>How Publishers and the Community Are Responding<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Publishers and industry groups are deploying multi\u2011pronged responses: shared screening platforms, image\u2011forensics, network analysis, identity verification (e.g., ORCID checks), and AI\u2011aware flagging tools that detect unusual textual patterns or \u201ctortured phrases.\u201d Cross\u2011publisher initiatives such as the STM Integrity Hub and pilot services that combine multiple screening tools are being trialled to intercept suspicious submissions before <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/publication-support-services\/peer-review-process\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"115\" title=\"Peer Review\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">peer review<\/a>. COPE and other ethics bodies are updating guidance to clarify how to handle undisclosed third\u2011party involvement and AI use. Still, detection must be coupled with transparent correction processes and better resourcing for investigations.<\/p>\n<p><!-- Practical Steps for Researchers, Administrators, and Publishers Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Practical_Steps_for_Researchers_Administrators_and_Publishers\"><\/span><strong>Practical Steps for Researchers, Administrators, and Publishers<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3>Researchers and Mentors<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Maintain transparency<\/strong>: disclose all third\u2011party assistance (editing, statistical help, or use of AI) in acknowledgements or methods.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Prioritize reproducibility<\/strong>: deposit raw data, code, and protocols in trusted repositories where appropriate.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Develop skills and time management<\/strong>: plan projects with supervisors to allow sufficient time for ethical research and writing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>University Administrators and Funders<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Align incentives<\/strong>: revise promotion and hiring criteria to value quality, reproducibility, open data, and mentoring rather than raw counts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Provide support<\/strong>: fund training in research integrity, academic writing, and responsible AI use; provide free or vetted language support to reduce pressure to outsource.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Strengthen oversight<\/strong>: require ORCID IDs, verify author affiliations, and mandate data availability statements for high\u2011risk outputs.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Publishers and Editors<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Implement multi\u2011layer screening<\/strong> at submission triage (plagiarism, image forensics, paper\u2011mill pattern detection).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Verify reviewer and editor identities<\/strong>; avoid overuse of guest editors without strict oversight.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Publish clear, detailed retraction notices<\/strong> and work with indexing services to flag unreliable literature quickly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!-- A Short Checklist for Research Groups and Journal Offices Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"A_Short_Checklist_for_Research_Groups_and_Journal_Offices\"><\/span><strong>A Short Checklist for Research Groups and Journal Offices<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Require and verify ORCID for all authors.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Share raw data and code where possible<\/strong> (repositories + links).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Declare any third\u2011party assistance and any AI tools used.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Run plagiarism and image checks before submission.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!-- Conclusion and Practical Support Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion_and_Practical_Support\"><\/span><strong>Conclusion and Practical Support<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>AI\u2011powered paper mills persist because demand (driven by career, institutional, and financial incentives) meets opportunity (low\u2011barrier journals, exploitable editorial processes, and scalable generative tools). Addressing the problem requires aligned action across researchers, institutions, and publishers: better incentives and training, robust submission screening, transparent correction procedures, and accessible, ethical support for scholars who need help with language and presentation.<\/p>\n<p>For researchers seeking legitimate help with manuscript quality and compliance, consider Enago\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/editing-services\">manuscript editing services<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/publication-support-services\/premium-package\">publication support<\/a> as supportive tools that can improve clarity and reduce desk rejections without compromising integrity; professional editing can complement, but not replace, responsible authorship practices. Enago\u2019s resources on publication ethics and editing can help teams avoid the temptation of unscrupulous third parties and meet journal expectations. (See <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/\">Enago Academy<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/responsible-ai-movement\">Responsible AI movement<\/a> pages for guidance on ethical use of AI and manuscript preparation.)<\/p>\n<div style=\"display:flex; gap:10px;justify-content:\" class=\"wps-pgfw-pdf-generate-icon__wrapper-frontend\">\n\t\t<a  href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57050?action=genpdf&amp;id=57050\" class=\"pgfw-single-pdf-download-button\" ><img data-src=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/plugins\/pdf-generator-for-wp\/admin\/src\/images\/PDF_Tray.svg\" title=\"Generate PDF\" style=\"width:auto; height:45px;\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" class=\"lazyload\"><\/a>\n\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A recent landscape study found more than 32,700 suspected fake papers linked to organised \u201cpaper&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":57151,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1988,2],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[1895],"class_list":["post-57050","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles","category-academic-writing"],"better_featured_image":{"id":57151,"alt_text":"AI-Powered Paper Mills: The New Threat to Research Integrity","caption":"","description":"Uncover how AI-powered paper mills are accelerating scientific fraud. Learn why researchers use them, the risks involved, and how institutions can detect and prevent this growing threat.","media_type":"image","media_details":{"width":2000,"height":848,"file":"2025\/12\/Gemini_Generated_Image_67f04e67f04e67f0-scaled.png","filesize":2692129,"sizes":{},"image_meta":{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0","keywords":[]},"original_image":"Gemini_Generated_Image_67f04e67f04e67f0.png"},"post":57050,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Gemini_Generated_Image_67f04e67f04e67f0-scaled.png"},"acf":{"faq_main_heading":"","faq_heading_one":"Why do researchers use paper mills?","faq_heading_two":"How has AI changed scientific fraud?","faq_heading_three":"How can you detect AI-generated research papers?","faq_heading_four":"What are the risks of using paper mills?","faq_heading_five":"How can universities prevent paper mill usage?","faq_heading_six":"How can universities prevent paper mill usage?","faq_description_one":"AI-powered paper mills are illicit services that utilize generative AI tools to mass-produce fraudulent scientific manuscripts, synthetic data, and fabricated images, which are then sold to researchers seeking easy authorship.","faq_description_two":"Researchers often turn to paper mills due to intense 'publish or perish' pressures, where career advancement, funding, and graduation requirements rely heavily on the quantity of publications rather than quality.","faq_description_three":"Generative AI has significantly lowered the barrier to entry for fraud by enabling the rapid creation of superficially plausible text and images. This allows mills to scale production cheaply and create content that is harder to detect than older, template-based fraud.","faq_description_four":"Detection involves using specialized tools to identify 'tortured phrases' (strange synonyms used to evade plagiarism checks), analyzing metadata for AI patterns, conducting image forensics, and verifying author identities and data provenance.","faq_description_five":"The consequences are severe, ranging from mass retractions and public reputational damage to institutional investigations, loss of funding, and the end of academic careers. Furthermore, it corrupts the scientific record, wasting resources on false leads.","faq_description_six":"Institutions can reduce risk by changing incentives to value research quality over quantity, providing legitimate language and editing support, and enforcing strict checks like ORCID verification and mandatory data availability statements."},"views":365,"single_webinar_page_date":null,"single_webinar_page_time":null,"session_agenda":null,"who_should_attend_this_session":null,"about_the_speaker_field":null,"co-webinar-sec":null,"co_webinar_sec_one":null,"speaker-name":null,"webinar-date":null,"webinar-time":null,"webinar-s-image":null,"custum_webinar_category":null,"authors":[{"term_id":1895,"user_id":4,"is_guest":0,"slug":"editor","display_name":"Enago Academy","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2ef4bc47f3ceaa56f5eb3b26f9520fad298ba36ede4f86315997ffb45db37a1f?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","author_category":"","user_url":"","last_name":"Academy","first_name":"Editor","job_title":"","description":"Enago Academy, the knowledge arm of Enago, offers comprehensive and up-to-date resources on academic research and scholarly publishing to all levels of scholarly professionals: students, researchers, editors, publishers, and academic societies. It is also a popular platform for networking, allowing researchers to learn, share, and discuss their experiences within their network and community. The team, which comprises subject matter experts, academicians, trainers, and technical project managers, are passionate about helping researchers at all levels establish a successful career, both within and outside academia."}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57050","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57050"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57050\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57055,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57050\/revisions\/57055"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/57151"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57050"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57050"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57050"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=57050"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}