{"id":57028,"date":"2025-12-01T19:22:36","date_gmt":"2025-12-01T13:22:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/?p=57028"},"modified":"2025-12-04T18:20:42","modified_gmt":"2025-12-04T12:20:42","slug":"influence-of-high-impact-factor-journals-on-field-paradigm-and-public-discourse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/influence-of-high-impact-factor-journals-on-field-paradigm-and-public-discourse\/","title":{"rendered":"Influence of High-Impact Factor Journals on field paradigm and public discourse"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- Introduction Section --><\/p>\n<p>A recent large-scale <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2407.09854\">analysis<\/a> found that only about 3.9% of Web of Science\u2013indexed publications (2010\u20132019) were cited at least once in policy documents, underscoring how selective the pathway from research to public policy is.<\/p>\n<p>This article examines how publishing in journals with high <em>impact factors<\/em> and high prestige affects the research agenda across fields, the mechanisms by which high\u2011profile outlets shape public discourse and policy uptake, and practical steps researchers and administrators can take to align scholarly goals with societal influence. The following sections outline what the <em>Journal Impact Factor (JIF)<\/em> does and does not do, when and why JIFs shape agendas, how policy uptake actually occurs, and actionable tips for maximizing societal reach without sacrificing scientific rigor.<\/p>\n<p><!-- What the Journal Impact Factor measures and why it matters Section --><\/p>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_74 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/influence-of-high-impact-factor-journals-on-field-paradigm-and-public-discourse\/#What_the_Journal_Impact_Factor_measures_and_why_it_matters\" >What the Journal Impact Factor measures and why it matters<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/influence-of-high-impact-factor-journals-on-field-paradigm-and-public-discourse\/#How_high%E2%80%91impact_journals_influence_the_research_agenda\" >How high\u2011impact journals influence the research agenda<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/influence-of-high-impact-factor-journals-on-field-paradigm-and-public-discourse\/#When_prestige_translates_into_public_discourse_and_policy\" >When prestige translates into public discourse and policy<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/influence-of-high-impact-factor-journals-on-field-paradigm-and-public-discourse\/#How_high%E2%80%91impact_journals_shape_public_discourse_beyond_citations\" >How high\u2011impact journals shape public discourse beyond citations<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/influence-of-high-impact-factor-journals-on-field-paradigm-and-public-discourse\/#Potential_problems_and_unintended_consequences\" >Potential problems and unintended consequences<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/influence-of-high-impact-factor-journals-on-field-paradigm-and-public-discourse\/#How_to_design_research_with_both_scholarly_and_policy_influence_in_mind\" >How to design research with both scholarly and policy influence in mind<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/influence-of-high-impact-factor-journals-on-field-paradigm-and-public-discourse\/#Practical_checklist_for_researchers_and_administrators\" >Practical checklist for researchers and administrators<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/influence-of-high-impact-factor-journals-on-field-paradigm-and-public-discourse\/#Examples_and_short_case_notes\" >Examples and short case notes<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/influence-of-high-impact-factor-journals-on-field-paradigm-and-public-discourse\/#How_this_affects_institutional_policy_what_administrators_should_note\" >How this affects institutional policy (what administrators should note)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/influence-of-high-impact-factor-journals-on-field-paradigm-and-public-discourse\/#Conclusion_and_recommended_next_steps\" >Conclusion and recommended next steps<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_the_Journal_Impact_Factor_measures_and_why_it_matters\"><\/span><strong>What the Journal Impact Factor measures and why it matters<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>The <em>impact factor<\/em> is a journal-level citation metric that reports the average citations to a journal\u2019s articles over a defined recent window. As a shorthand for prestige and visibility, the JIF influences hiring, promotion, and funding decisions in many institutions and disciplines. However, scholarly critiques and policy groups have long cautioned against using JIF as a proxy for the quality of individual articles or researchers. The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (<em>DORA<\/em>) and its ongoing guidance work aim to reduce reliance on journal metrics in evaluation processes.<\/p>\n<p><!-- How high\u2011impact journals influence the research agenda Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_high%E2%80%91impact_journals_influence_the_research_agenda\"><\/span><strong>How high\u2011impact journals influence the research agenda<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>High\u2011impact journals affect research agendas through multiple, reinforcing channels. First, journals with large readerships and media outreach produce greater visibility for certain topics; researchers and funders respond to that visibility by prioritizing related questions and methods. Generalist, high\u2011JIF outlets (for example, widely read multidisciplinary journals) can promote cross\u2011disciplinary attention to a topic, accelerating resource flows and new collaborations. Conversely, specialized journals steer concentrated, field\u2011specific developments where cumulative incremental advances matter more. Practical choices by researchers whether to target broad or specialist outlets therefore shape both short\u2011term attention and long\u2011term agenda setting.<\/p>\n<p><!-- When prestige translates into public discourse and policy Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"When_prestige_translates_into_public_discourse_and_policy\"><\/span><strong>When prestige translates into public discourse and policy<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Prestige alone does not guarantee policy influence. Recent empirical work shows that policy uptake depends on a mix of factors beyond journal prestige: news and blog coverage, social media engagement, open dissemination practices, authorship composition (including non\u2011academic collaborators), and the explicit policy relevance of the findings. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1751157724000439\" class=\"broken_link\">One large study<\/a> using Overton and Altmetric data concluded that media mentions and communication channels had a stronger association with policy citations than academic citations alone; open access status and active dissemination increased the probability of being cited in policy, while paywalled articles were less likely to be policy\u2011cited. Another analysis found policy citations are concentrated in specific fields (social sciences, life\/earth sciences, health), and that only a small minority of papers ever appear in policy documents. These results indicate that visibility strategies and topic relevance often matter more for policy uptake than JIF per se.<\/p>\n<p><!-- How high\u2011impact journals shape public discourse beyond citations Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_high%E2%80%91impact_journals_shape_public_discourse_beyond_citations\"><\/span><strong>How high\u2011impact journals shape public discourse beyond citations<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>High\u2011profile journals often employ press offices, embargoed releases and media relationships that amplify select studies to journalists and the public. This process can rapidly translate scientific findings into headlines, framing public understanding and shaping the policy conversation. At times, this amplification elevates methodological or interpretive issues into public debate for instance, ethics and bias topics in AI drawing outsized attention in policy fora even when academic citation counts are modest. Studies on disciplinary differences in internal vs external impacts show that some research topics (e.g., ethics, societal risk) are disproportionately influential in policy and media despite lower academic citation rates, highlighting how agenda\u2011setting operates through thematic relevance and communicative reach.<\/p>\n<p><!-- Potential problems and unintended consequences Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Potential_problems_and_unintended_consequences\"><\/span><strong>Potential problems and unintended consequences<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>When institutions and funders privilege JIFs for evaluation, several distortions can occur. Researchers may tailor projects toward topics or formats likely to land in high\u2011JIF journals (novelty over reproducibility), preferentially pursue certain methods, or avoid regional and methodological diversity that yields lower citation metrics. Overemphasis on JIFs can disincentivize long\u2011term, locally contextual research that better serves policy needs. Moreover, reliance on journal metrics does not reliably predict policy uptake: quantitative analyses of SDG\u2011related research show only modest relationships between bibliometric indicators and policy citations, suggesting that <a href=\"https:\/\/ideas.repec.org\/a\/wly\/sustdv\/v33y2025i2p1848-1860.html\">non\u2011academic factors<\/a> and communication strategies are often decisive.<\/p>\n<p><!-- How to design research with both scholarly and policy influence in mind Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_to_design_research_with_both_scholarly_and_policy_influence_in_mind\"><\/span><strong>How to design research with both scholarly and policy influence in mind<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Researchers and research leaders can pursue a balanced strategy that acknowledges the attention benefits of high\u2011impact venues while actively supporting policy translation. Key approaches include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Align research questions with clear policy or practice implications and identify relevant stakeholder audiences early in project design.<\/li>\n<li>Use preprints, open data, and accessible summaries to accelerate discoverability and uptake, especially where time\u2011sensitive policy windows exist.<\/li>\n<li>Cultivate media engagement and policy briefs: collaborate with institutional communications offices, prepare concise policy summaries, and share findings through targeted channels.<\/li>\n<li>Build interdisciplinary and practitioner collaborations; non\u2011academic co\u2011authors and cross\u2011disciplinary teams tend to increase the likelihood of policy citations.<\/li>\n<li>Choose target journals deliberately: match audience and scope rather than chasing JIF alone; specialist journals can provide deeper traction within policymaking communities for field\u2011specific agendas.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!-- Practical checklist for researchers and administrators Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Practical_checklist_for_researchers_and_administrators\"><\/span><strong>Practical checklist for researchers and administrators<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Clarify the intended research impact (academic, policy, practice, public) before submission.<\/li>\n<li>Map likely policy audiences and their timeframes; draft a short policy brief at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/submission-preparation.htm\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"123\" title=\"manuscript submission\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">manuscript submission<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Select journals based on scope, audience and dissemination pathways, not just JIF.<\/li>\n<li>Prepare lay summaries, press\u2011ready materials, and data access statements.<\/li>\n<li>Track mentions using Altmetric\/Overton to evaluate reach toward policy documents and adjust dissemination strategy accordingly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!-- Examples and short case notes Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Examples_and_short_case_notes\"><\/span><strong>Examples and short case notes<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>A field\u2011level <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2505.16061\">analysis<\/a> of NLP research shows that while some topics (language modelling) drive high academic citations, topics addressing societal risks and fairness receive disproportionate attention in policy and media, even when academic citation counts are lower. This illustrates discipline\u2011specific divergence between scholarly and societal impact channels. (<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2505.16061?utm_source=openai\">arxiv.org<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Large cross\u2011disciplinary studies using Overton\/Altmetric indicate that media visibility and open dissemination are strong predictors of policy citations, reinforcing the practical need for communication strategies that go beyond placement in high\u2011JIF outlets.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!-- How this affects institutional policy (what administrators should note) Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_this_affects_institutional_policy_what_administrators_should_note\"><\/span><strong>How this affects institutional policy (what administrators should note)<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>University leaders and research office staff should reassess evaluation rubrics and promotion criteria to reward diverse forms of impact. DORA\u2019s evolving guidance and institutional uptake provide models for responsible assessment that de-emphasize raw JIFs and adopt portfolio\u2011based evaluation of research quality, openness, and societal contribution. Administrators can also invest in capacity for knowledge translation communications teams, policy liaison roles, and training for researchers on public engagement to help research convert visibility into measurable policy influence.<\/p>\n<p><!-- Conclusion and recommended next steps Section --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion_and_recommended_next_steps\"><\/span><strong>Conclusion and recommended next steps<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Publishing in high\u2011impact journals can accelerate visibility and can sometimes help set field agendas, but it is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for policy influence. Policy uptake typically depends on topic relevance, targeted dissemination, open access practices, and effective translation for non\u2011academic audiences. Researchers should plan impact pathways as part of their research design and consider a mixed publication strategy that balances prestige with audience fit.<\/p>\n<p>For researchers seeking hands\u2011on support with journal targeting and manuscript clarity, Enago\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/research-impact\">Research Impact Services<\/a> can broaden your audiences and widen the impact of your research with professional multimedia production and effective promotional strategy.<\/p>\n<div style=\"display:flex; gap:10px;justify-content:\" class=\"wps-pgfw-pdf-generate-icon__wrapper-frontend\">\n\t\t<a  href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57028?action=genpdf&amp;id=57028\" class=\"pgfw-single-pdf-download-button\" ><img data-src=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/plugins\/pdf-generator-for-wp\/admin\/src\/images\/PDF_Tray.svg\" title=\"Generate PDF\" style=\"width:auto; height:45px;\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" class=\"lazyload\"><\/a>\n\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A recent large-scale analysis found that only about 3.9% of Web of Science\u2013indexed publications (2010\u20132019)&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":57034,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[1895],"class_list":["post-57028","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-academic-writing"],"better_featured_image":{"id":57034,"alt_text":"Journal Impact Factor & Research Policy Influence: What Really Matters","caption":"","description":" Only 3.9% of research influences policy. Learn how journal impact factors shape research agendas, what drives policy uptake, and strategies to maximize societal impact beyond JIF rankings.","media_type":"image","media_details":{"width":910,"height":340,"file":"2025\/11\/Sami-EA-Blogs-Banner-910-x-340-px-17.jpg","filesize":213476,"sizes":{},"image_meta":{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"1","keywords":[]}},"post":57028,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Sami-EA-Blogs-Banner-910-x-340-px-17.jpg"},"acf":{"faq_main_heading":"","faq_heading_one":"Does publishing in high impact factor journals guarantee policy influence?","faq_heading_two":"What percentage of research actually influences public policy?","faq_heading_three":"What factors predict whether research will be cited in policy documents?","faq_heading_four":"Should I target high impact factor journals to increase policy uptake?","faq_heading_five":"How do high impact journals shape research agendas?","faq_heading_six":"What is DORA and why does it discourage using journal impact factors?","faq_description_one":"No, prestige alone does not guarantee policy influence. Studies show media mentions, open access, active dissemination, and policy relevance have stronger associations with policy citations than journal impact factors. Only 3.9% of Web of Science publications are cited in policy documents.","faq_description_two":"Only about 3.9% of Web of Science\u2013indexed publications from 2010-2019 were cited at least once in policy documents, showing how selective the pathway from research to policy is. Policy uptake concentrates in specific fields like social sciences, health, and life sciences.","faq_description_three":"Media coverage, open access status, social media engagement, non-academic collaborators, and explicit policy relevance predict policy citations more strongly than academic citations alone. Paywalled articles are significantly less likely to be cited in policy documents than open access publications.","faq_description_four":"Not necessarily match journals to your audience and scope rather than chasing impact factors. Specialist journals often provide deeper traction within policymaking communities for field-specific topics. Combine publication strategy with active dissemination, policy briefs, and media engagement for maximum impact.","faq_description_five":"High-impact journals influence agendas through visibility, media outreach, and resource flows. Researchers and funders prioritize topics featured in prestigious outlets. Generalist high-JIF journals promote cross-disciplinary attention, while specialized journals steer concentrated field-specific developments and incremental advances.","faq_description_six":"The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) discourages using journal-level metrics like impact factors to evaluate individual researchers or articles because JIF measures journal prestige, not article quality. DORA promotes portfolio-based evaluation emphasizing research quality, openness, and societal contribution."},"views":107,"single_webinar_page_date":null,"single_webinar_page_time":null,"session_agenda":null,"who_should_attend_this_session":null,"about_the_speaker_field":null,"co-webinar-sec":null,"co_webinar_sec_one":null,"speaker-name":null,"webinar-date":null,"webinar-time":null,"webinar-s-image":null,"custum_webinar_category":null,"authors":[{"term_id":1895,"user_id":4,"is_guest":0,"slug":"editor","display_name":"Enago Academy","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2ef4bc47f3ceaa56f5eb3b26f9520fad298ba36ede4f86315997ffb45db37a1f?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","author_category":"","user_url":"","last_name":"Academy","first_name":"Editor","job_title":"","description":"Enago Academy, the knowledge arm of Enago, offers comprehensive and up-to-date resources on academic research and scholarly publishing to all levels of scholarly professionals: students, researchers, editors, publishers, and academic societies. It is also a popular platform for networking, allowing researchers to learn, share, and discuss their experiences within their network and community. The team, which comprises subject matter experts, academicians, trainers, and technical project managers, are passionate about helping researchers at all levels establish a successful career, both within and outside academia."}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57028"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57028\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57037,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57028\/revisions\/57037"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/57034"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57028"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=57028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}