{"id":48723,"date":"2024-09-25T20:23:52","date_gmt":"2024-09-25T14:23:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/?p=48723"},"modified":"2024-09-25T20:27:15","modified_gmt":"2024-09-25T14:27:15","slug":"peer-review-research-ethics-balancing-challenges-and-tech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/peer-review-research-ethics-balancing-challenges-and-tech\/","title":{"rendered":"Peer Review and Research Ethics: Insights on challenges, innovations, and future directions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/publication-support-services\/peer-review-process\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"115\" title=\"Peer Review\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Peer review<\/a> has long been heralded as a cornerstone of academic publishing, entrusted with upholding the ethical rigor of scientific research. Yet, as we delve deeper into the current state of peer review, it becomes increasingly clear that while it plays a crucial role in maintaining research integrity, it is far from perfect. A <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2023.101423\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">study<\/a> released in 2023 revealed a troubling gap in peer review&#8217;s efficacy \u2014 only a small fraction of peer reviewers recommended rejection for papers that were later retracted. This raises serious questions about the system\u2019s ability to detect ethical issues.<\/p>\n<p>So, why does peer review, despite its importance, often fall short in detecting and preventing unethical research practices? And what can be done to address this growing concern while ensuring the process remains rigorous yet fair? As academia continues to grapple with these questions, embracing a balanced approach that acknowledges the current peer review system\u2019s shortcomings and explores how innovative technologies can bridge these gaps without compromising ethical oversight becomes crucial.<\/p>\n<p>Recently, we conducted a study to examine the impact of retractions and assess the efficiency of the peer review system in safeguarding research integrity. The survey received 431 responses and captured insights from diverse range of stakeholders involved in research and publishing.<\/p>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_74 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/peer-review-research-ethics-balancing-challenges-and-tech\/#Key_Findings_From_the_Study\" >Key Findings From the Study<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/peer-review-research-ethics-balancing-challenges-and-tech\/#A_Flawed_yet_Essential_System\" >A Flawed yet Essential System<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/peer-review-research-ethics-balancing-challenges-and-tech\/#Technology_%E2%80%93_A_double-edged_sword\" >Technology \u2013 A double-edged sword?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/peer-review-research-ethics-balancing-challenges-and-tech\/#Striking_the_Right_Balance\" >Striking the Right Balance<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Findings_From_the_Study\"><\/span>Key Findings From the Study<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li>The current peer review system is perceived to be moderately effective in upholding ethics, acknowledging of substantial room for improvement in improving its robustness.<\/li>\n<li>Peer reviewers reportedly face multiple challenges, including detecting false or AI-generated datasets, time constraints, limited access to supporting materials, and identifying research misconduct, all of which hinder the effectiveness of ethical evaluations in the current peer review system.<\/li>\n<li>Innovative technologies are recognized by majority respondents for enhancing research integrity in peer review by improving the detection of issues such as plagiarism, data manipulation, duplicate submissions, and validating statistical methods.<\/li>\n<li>Challenges identified in integrating technology into peer review highlight the need for a human-technology balance, as concerns like over-reliance, reduced transparency, and cost and accessibility barriers were raised.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"A_Flawed_yet_Essential_System\"><\/span>A Flawed yet Essential System<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>There appears a nuanced perception of the peer review process in upholding research ethics and integrity. While a substantial majority believes the process is somewhat effective, there is a clear acknowledgment of the need for improvement in detecting ethical issues.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-48731 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture1.png\" alt=\"Efficiency of the peer review system\" width=\"1645\" height=\"961\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture1.png 1645w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture1-394x230.png 394w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture1-750x438.png 750w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture1-768x449.png 768w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture1-1536x897.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture1-357x210.png 357w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture1-150x88.png 150w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 1645px) 100vw, 1645px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 1645px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 1645\/961;\" \/>Ethical oversight should not be a gamble \u2014 it must be a consistent and reliable safeguard against misconduct. However, several challenges spanning technological, procedural, and ethical domains were identified to be faced by the reviewers.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-48734 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture3.png\" alt=\"Challenges in using AI for peer review\" width=\"1639\" height=\"1006\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture3.png 1639w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture3-375x230.png 375w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture3-750x460.png 750w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture3-768x471.png 768w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture3-1536x943.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture3-150x92.png 150w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 1639px) 100vw, 1639px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 1639px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 1639\/1006;\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-48727 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-10.png\" alt=\"Challenges in peer review\" width=\"900\" height=\"200\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-10.png 900w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-10-470x104.png 470w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-10-750x167.png 750w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-10-768x171.png 768w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-10-150x33.png 150w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 900px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 900\/200;\" \/>This challenge is likely to grow with AI and technological advancements, demanding the development of new tools and skills for reviewers. Additionally, time constraints and workload issues suggest that the increasing volume of research outputs may be overburdening reviewers. This challenge is compounded by limited access to supporting materials, further complicating the review process.<\/p>\n<p>The challenges reported in identifying research misconduct and the lack of specific ethical training highlight the need for more specialized education and resources for reviewers. These issues, combined with difficulties in managing conflicts of interest, indicate that the current system may not be adequately equipped to ensure comprehensive ethical oversight.<\/p>\n<p>The bottom line is that peer reviewers are struggling to keep pace with the sheer volume and complexity of research submissions. Given these challenges, it\u2019s no wonder that unethical practices occasionally slip through the cracks.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Technology_%E2%80%93_A_double-edged_sword\"><\/span>Technology \u2013 A double-edged sword?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-48729 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-8.png\" alt=\"AI in peer review\" width=\"900\" height=\"200\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-8.png 900w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-8-470x104.png 470w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-8-750x167.png 750w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-8-768x171.png 768w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-8-150x33.png 150w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 900px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 900\/200;\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Enter technology, with its promise to revolutionize the peer review process. Tools for detecting plagiarism, data manipulation, and statistical errors are already making significant strides in improving research integrity. However, the integration of these tools is not without its own set of challenges. Issues in using technology for peer review present a complex landscape, pointing to the need for addressing interconnected issues.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-48737 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture4.png\" alt=\"Challenges in using AI for peer review\" width=\"1781\" height=\"973\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture4.png 1781w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture4-421x230.png 421w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture4-750x410.png 750w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture4-768x420.png 768w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture4-1536x839.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Picture4-150x82.png 150w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 1781px) 100vw, 1781px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 1781px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 1781\/973;\" \/>While technology can undoubtedly aid in the detection of ethical breaches, it cannot replace the nuanced judgment of human reviewers. Concerns about automated systems introducing biases or lacking interpretability must be taken seriously. Moreover, the costs and infrastructure required to adopt these tools could further widen the gap between well-funded institutions and those in under-resourced regions, exacerbating existing inequalities in the academic publishing landscape.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Striking_the_Right_Balance\"><\/span><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-48728 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-14.png\" alt=\"Geographica_PeerReview\" width=\"900\" height=\"200\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-14.png 900w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-14-470x104.png 470w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-14-750x167.png 750w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-14-768x171.png 768w, https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Researchers-Should-Set-Their-Priorities-Straight-and-Institutions-Should-Aid-with-Acquiring-of-the-Publication-Funds-14-150x33.png 150w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 900px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 900\/200;\" \/>Striking the Right Balance<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>To truly strengthen research integrity, we must find a balance between human oversight and technological assistance. It\u2019s not about replacing peer reviewers with AI but rather about equipping them with the tools they need to do their jobs more effectively. Publishers should invest in user-friendly, transparent technologies that complement rather than supplant human judgment. Additionally, training peer reviewers to use these tools ethically and effectively is equally critical.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, we must address the systemic issues facing peer reviewers today. Time constraints and workloads need to be alleviated through better resource allocation and workflow management. Furthermore, specialized training on identifying ethical misconduct should be mandatory. Collaborative efforts across institutions and regions will also be crucial to ensuring that technological advancements in peer review are equitable and accessible.<\/p>\n<p>The peer review process is at a crossroads. On one hand, it remains essential to maintaining the ethical integrity of published research. On the other, it \u00a0clearly needs reform to keep pace with the increasing volume and complexity of research outputs. Technological innovations offer exciting opportunities, but they must be adopted thoughtfully, with a clear understanding of their limitations.<\/p>\n<p>By investing in reliable peer review technologies, addressing the challenges faced by reviewers, and promoting a collective effort to uphold research integrity, we can create a more robust, adaptive, and equitable system for the future. It\u2019s time for academia to embrace change\u2014not to diminish the role of peer reviewers, but to empower them to uphold the ethical standards that science and society rely on.<\/p>\n<div style=\"display:flex; gap:10px;justify-content:\" class=\"wps-pgfw-pdf-generate-icon__wrapper-frontend\">\n\t\t<a  href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48723?action=genpdf&amp;id=48723\" class=\"pgfw-single-pdf-download-button\" ><img data-src=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/plugins\/pdf-generator-for-wp\/admin\/src\/images\/PDF_Tray.svg\" title=\"Generate PDF\" style=\"width:auto; height:45px;\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" class=\"lazyload\"><\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t{\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"@context\": \"http:\/\/schema.org\",\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"@type\": \"CreativeWorkSeries\",\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"aggregateRating\": {\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"@type\": \"AggregateRating\",\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"bestRating\": \"5\",\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"ratingCount\": \"1\",\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"ratingValue\": \"5\"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t},\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"image\": \"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings.png\",\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"name\": \"Peer Review and Research Ethics: Insights on challenges, innovations, and future directions\",\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"description\": \"Peer Review and Research Ethics: Insights on challenges, innovations, and future directions\"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t}\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Peer review has long been heralded as a cornerstone of academic publishing, entrusted with upholding&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9136,"featured_media":48726,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[86,1537],"tags":[1633,44,1601],"ppma_author":[1925],"class_list":["post-48723","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-and-events","category-trending-now","tag-ai-in-publishing","tag-peer-review","tag-peer-review-week"],"better_featured_image":{"id":48726,"alt_text":"Peer Review & Research Ethics: Balancing Challenges and Tech","caption":"","description":"Read now to understand the perceived efficiency of the peer review process and technology's role in upholding research integrity. ","media_type":"image","media_details":{"width":910,"height":340,"file":"2024\/09\/PR_Findings.png","filesize":273751,"sizes":{"medium":{"file":"PR_Findings-470x176.png","width":470,"height":176,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":95618,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-470x176.png"},"large":{"file":"PR_Findings-750x280.png","width":750,"height":280,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":232990,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-750x280.png"},"thumbnail":{"file":"PR_Findings-170x150.png","width":170,"height":150,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":28951,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-170x150.png"},"medium_large":{"file":"PR_Findings-768x287.png","width":768,"height":287,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":245699,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-768x287.png"},"tf-client-image-size":{"file":"PR_Findings-120x120.png","width":120,"height":120,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":15805,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-120x120.png"},"publisher-tb1":{"file":"PR_Findings-86x64.png","width":86,"height":64,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":7130,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-86x64.png"},"publisher-sm":{"file":"PR_Findings-210x136.png","width":210,"height":136,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":31561,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-210x136.png"},"publisher-mg2":{"file":"PR_Findings-279x220.png","width":279,"height":220,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":69952,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-279x220.png"},"publisher-md":{"file":"PR_Findings-357x210.png","width":357,"height":210,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":92707,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-357x210.png"},"publisher-lg":{"file":"PR_Findings-750x340.png","width":750,"height":340,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":242269,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-750x340.png"},"publisher-tall-sm":{"file":"PR_Findings-180x217.png","width":180,"height":217,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":40255,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-180x217.png"},"publisher-tall-lg":{"file":"PR_Findings-267x322.png","width":267,"height":322,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":83537,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-267x322.png"},"publisher-tall-big":{"file":"PR_Findings-368x340.png","width":368,"height":340,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":103857,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-368x340.png"},"rpwe-thumbnail":{"file":"PR_Findings-45x45.png","width":45,"height":45,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":2470,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-45x45.png"},"web-stories-poster-portrait":{"file":"PR_Findings-640x340.png","width":640,"height":340,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":217770,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-640x340.png"},"web-stories-publisher-logo":{"file":"PR_Findings-96x96.png","width":96,"height":96,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":10313,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-96x96.png"},"web-stories-thumbnail":{"file":"PR_Findings-150x56.png","width":150,"height":56,"mime-type":"image\/png","filesize":10886,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings-150x56.png"}},"image_meta":{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0","keywords":[]}},"post":48723,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/PR_Findings.png"},"acf":{"faq_main_heading":"","faq_heading_one":"","faq_heading_two":"","faq_heading_three":"","faq_heading_four":"","faq_heading_five":"","faq_heading_six":"","faq_description_one":"","faq_description_two":"","faq_description_three":"","faq_description_four":"","faq_description_five":"","faq_description_six":""},"views":1154,"single_webinar_page_date":null,"single_webinar_page_time":null,"session_agenda":null,"who_should_attend_this_session":null,"about_the_speaker_field":null,"co-webinar-sec":null,"co_webinar_sec_one":null,"speaker-name":null,"webinar-date":null,"webinar-time":null,"webinar-s-image":null,"custum_webinar_category":null,"authors":[{"term_id":1925,"user_id":9136,"is_guest":0,"slug":"anagha","display_name":"Anagha Nair","avatar_url":{"url":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/New-Project.jpg","url2x":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/New-Project.jpg"},"author_category":"","user_url":"","last_name":"Nair","first_name":"Anagha","job_title":"","description":"Anagha Nair is a Scientific Content Expert by profession who thrives on understanding and simplifying the intricacies in academia. Her educational qualification as a Masters degree holder in Biochemistry is a testament to her solid academic background in research with papers published in scientific journals. She has been actively involved with various organizations dedicated to advancing research. Driven by curiosity, Anagha is enthusiastic to learn and evolve in the field of science communications.\r\n\r\nHer commitment to dilute complex topics and issues in scientific publishing into captivating narratives makes her blogs relatable for young and aspiring research minds."}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48723","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9136"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48723"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48723\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48741,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48723\/revisions\/48741"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/48726"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48723"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=48723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}