evaluation Archives - Enago Blog: Scientific Publication Help
How to write a scientific paper, How to publish in a research journal English Editing and Publication Support for Scientific Manuscripts

Posts Tagged ‘evaluation’

04 October 2010  |  Posted in Response to Reviewer, Review Criteria  |  1 Comment »

Once peer reviewers respond with comments on an article submitted to a research journal, authors have to determine the most appropriate way of responding to their comments and recommendations, in order to ensure acceptance and eventual publication of the article. An outline of the strategies which may be adopted are described in the attached presentation. Evaluation criteria and referee reports have been treated in previous posts.

The next two posts will address the topic of rejection of manuscripts, reasons why this may happen, and how to minimize this possibility.

This post was written by William Stevenson, an English editor with Enago based out of the USA.

29 September 2010  |  Posted in Review Criteria  |  Comment on this post »

From the moment you submit your paper to a journal until you receive the referee report may be a period filled with apprehension and/or expectation. The report of the peer reviewer goes a long way in deciding the publication prospects, and therefore the eventual impact of your work. The presentation below summarizes the typical considerations in putting together a referee report, based on the evaluation criteria used by the peer reviewer.

The next post will have a discussion about how to address disagreements between authors and referees in the peer-review process.

This post was written by William Stevenson, an English editor with Enago based out of the USA.

27 September 2010  |  Posted in Presentation aspects, Review Criteria  |  Comment on this post »

Peer Review can be a puzzling and many a times, frustrating process for researchers, even experienced ones. Peer review, which is expected to be an objective exercise, can never completely be free of subjectivity, due to its very nature. Further, the intricacies involved may make it difficult to comprehend various aspects of the process. The attached presentation highlights some of the criteria used for evaluating scientific manuscripts, including:

(1) Overall Research Considerations

(2) Evaluation of Presentation Aspects

(3) Assessment of Description of Research

Please view the presentation below for more details.

The next post will describe how a typical referee report about a manuscript is put together using the above mentioned evaluation criteria.

This post was written by William Stevenson, an English editor with Enago based out of the USA.



Research paper topics, editing proofreading serviceHow to publish in a research journal
Disclaimer : The opinions expressed here by the Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs' alone, and do not reflect the opinions of Crimson Interactive or any employee thereof. Crimson Interactive is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the Bloggers. While every caution has been taken to provide readers with the most accurate information and honest analysis, please use your discretion before taking any decisions based on the information in this blog. Author will not compensate you in any way whatsoever if you ever happen to suffer a loss/inconvenience/damage because of/while making use of information in this blog.

English Transcription | Englisch Korrektur | Revisão de Inglês | Tradutor Português Inglês | Revisão Inglês | 論文翻譯 | 英文編修 | 日英翻訳 | 英文校閲 | 영문교정 | 영문교정 | 英文校正・翻訳サービス | 日英翻訳会社