Rejection Archives - Enago Blog: Scientific Publication Help
How to write a scientific paper, How to publish in a research journal English Editing and Publication Support for Scientific Manuscripts

Articles Related by ‘Rejection’

30 May 2014  |  Posted in Publication, Rejection  |  Comment on this post »
curb-your-enthusiasm

Authors are understandably excited about the results of their research and aren’t always modest about trumpeting it. A finding is often described as novel, unique, the first such example ever published. Results may not be merely interesting, but remarkable, intriguing, unprecedented. Words alone may fail to do justice to the occasion so extra emphasis is added by italics and exclamation marks: the first example of –––! Although this tendency is understandable it’s not good form. Whenever you find yourself writing purple prose, resist the urge and stick to black and white.

Continue Reading
05 August 2013  |  Posted in Choice of journal, Rejection, Review Criteria  |  Comment on this post »

It’s every professor’s nightmare. At the end of a project, he and his graduate student write up the results of the research, and submit the paper. The journal editor promptly responds that they have already received and accepted a paper on a closely related topic. In light of this development, the editor is doubtful that the journal should publish their paper. The professor is distraught, and the graduate student still more so. Have his years of his work been for naught? Certainly not. Although being scooped will take some of the sheen off the paper, it should and can be published.

Continue Reading
03 November 2010  |  Posted in Rejection, Review Criteria  |  2 Comments »
A fact that is not very widely known or universally accepted by authors is that manuscripts may be rejected without the due and expected peer review process. While manuscripts have to go through the peer review process in order to be published, they can be rejected without peer review. For high-impact, general science journals, the majority of submitted papers may be rejected in this manner.
Continue Reading
13 October 2010  |  Posted in Rejection, Review Criteria  |  Comment on this post »
In evaluating a manuscript submitted for publication in a journal, a peer reviewer takes into account many factors. The primary considerations related to quality, originality and presentation are listed in the attached presentation. Based on these, suggestions are outlined, which would minimize the possibility of rejection.
Continue Reading
11 October 2010  |  Posted in Journal requirements, Rejection  |  Comment on this post »
Researchers usually dread the prospect of having their manuscript rejected when it is submitted for publication, since it represents a big setback to their endeavors. There are myriad reasons for this, and it is essential to understand the fundamental considerations involved in maximizing the probability of acceptance. This post outlines the journal requirements and research aspects with relevant data.
Continue Reading


Research paper topics, editing proofreading serviceHow to publish in a research journal
Disclaimer : The opinions expressed here by the Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs' alone, and do not reflect the opinions of Crimson Interactive or any employee thereof. Crimson Interactive is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the Bloggers. While every caution has been taken to provide readers with the most accurate information and honest analysis, please use your discretion before taking any decisions based on the information in this blog. Author will not compensate you in any way whatsoever if you ever happen to suffer a loss/inconvenience/damage because of/while making use of information in this blog.

English Transcription | Englisch Korrektur | Revisão de Inglês | Tradução de Artigos | Revisão Inglês | 論文翻譯 | 英文編修 | 日英翻訳 | 英文校閲 | 영문교정 | 영문교정 | 英文校正・翻訳サービス | 日英翻訳会社
英文校正 | 英語テープ起こし | 英語テープ起こし